MANISH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. BOARD OF REVENUE,U.P. AT LUCKNOW THRU. MEMBER AND 4 OTHERS
A227/4594/2025 · 2025-08-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154778 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154778 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44836 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4594 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manish Kumar And 2 Others Respondent :- Board Of Revenue,U.P. At Lucknow Thru. Member And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faiz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent No.1 while notice on behalf of the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.2 has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent No. 3 to 5 is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Board of Revenue, U.P. to decide revision under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, computerized case No.R201119470044090, revision No.1221/2011-12 titled as Hajari Lal Vs. Ladli Prasad and others, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. is directed to decide revision under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, computerized case No.R201119470044090, revision No.1221/2011-12 titled as Hajari Lal Vs. Ladli Prasad and others, expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this
order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 1.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench