Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154775 (ALL)

RAMESH KUMAR v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER

A227/4535/2025 · 2025-07-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44083 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4535 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Salik Ram Tiwari,Arti Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2 the Consolidation Officer Final Record-I, Sadar, Sultanpur to decide the Case No. 50 Rule 109 U.P. C.H. Rules connected Case No. 457 (Computerized No. 2022550463060090) under Section 9-A(2) of U.P. C.H. Act "Ramesh Versus State" Village Kaudiyawan, Pargana Baraunsa, Teshil Sadar, District Sultanpur, pending since 12.3.2013, expeditiously within an stipulated period as soon as possible. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2- i.e. the Consolidation Officer Final Record-I, Sadar, Sultanpur is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Case No. 50 Rule 109 U.P. C.H. Rules connected Case No. 457 (Computerized No. 2022550463060090) under Section 9-A(2) of U.P. C.H. Act "Ramesh Versus State" Village Kaudiyawan, Pargana Baraunsa, Teshil Sadar, District Sultanpur, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench