APHC010197902010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. TIRUMALARAJU AJAY VARMA, RAJAHMUNDRY, & ANR., S/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN PERICHARLA SRIDEVI, W/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT, HINDU, 38 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 32 89, L. PINNAMGATTU STREET, 2. TIRUMALARAJU KALYANI SUNISHA, D/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN PERICHARLA SRIDEVI, W/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT, HINDU, 38 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 32 STREET, 1. SRI T V S R HARIDUTT SECUNDERABAD 500 094 ANR, S/O. LATE L.J. RAJU LAB TECHNICIAN IN CENTRAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, HINDU R/O. H.NO. 38 HIGH SCHOOL, SECUNDERABAD 2. THE STATE OF ANDH PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 213 OF 2010 TIRUMALARAJU AJAY VARMA, RAJAHMUNDRY, & ANR., S/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN PERICHARLA SRIDEVI, W/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT, HINDU, 38 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 32 NAMGATTU STREET, TIRUMALARAJU KALYANI SUNISHA, D/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN PERICHARLA SRIDEVI, W/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT, HINDU, 38 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 32-1-89, L. PINNAMGATTU ...PETITIONER(S) AND SRI T V S R HARIDUTT SECUNDERABAD 500 094 ANR, S/O. LATE L.J. RAJU LAB TECHNICIAN IN CENTRAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, HINDU R/O. H.NO. 38-16/93, ROHINI COLONY, NEAR SAINIK PURI HIGH SCHOOL, SECUNDERABAD - 500 094. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO TIRUMALARAJU AJAY VARMA, RAJAHMUNDRY, & ANR., S/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN PERICHARLA SRIDEVI, W/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT, HINDU, 38 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO. 32-1- TIRUMALARAJU KALYANI SUNISHA, D/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT STUDENT, BEING MINOR REPTD. BY HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN PERICHARLA SRIDEVI, W/O. T.V.S.R. HARIDUTT, HINDU, 38 89, L. PINNAMGATTU ...PETITIONER(S) SRI T V S R HARIDUTT SECUNDERABAD 500 094 ANR, S/O. LATE L.J. RAJU LAB TECHNICIAN IN CENTRAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, 16/93, ROHINI COLONY, NEAR SAINIK PURI RA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the present Criminal Revision Case by enhancing the maintenance granted to the petitioners herein in the Order dated 03-12-2009 passed in M.C. No. 115 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Family cum Addl. District Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry from Rs. 3,000/- per month to Rs. 7,000/- per month to each of the petitioners herein. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 03.12.2009 passed by the learned Family-cum-Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry, in M.C.No.115 of 2008. 2. Heard. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Criminal Revision Case does not survive. 4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present Criminal Revision Petition. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as the cause does not survive. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 21.8.2025 TJN 132 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 213 OF 2010 Dated: 21.8.2025 TJN