OM PRAKASH v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND 15 OTHERS
A227/4525/2025 · 2025-07-30
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154758 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154758 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44106 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4525 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Respondent :- Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay,Ram Raj Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents no.1 and 5 and Shri Mohan Singh, who has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha- respondent no.4. 2. In view of the order proposed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to expeditiously decide the Appeal bearing Case No. 334/2025 (Computerized Case No. C202504000000334) "Abdul Aziz and others Vs. Gaon Sabha and others", under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue code 2006, pertaining to land Gata Nos. 706, 707, 705 and 703 situated in Village Palpur, Pargana Jagdishpur, Tehsil Musafirkhana, District Amethi, in accordance with law, within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. 4. It has been submitted that after the Patthar Nasab was done on 21.1.2025 in presence of the parties, the respondents no. 2 and 3 having no right, title and interest filed an appeal on 3.2.2025 in the court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya. Respondent no. 9 (proforma respondent no.12 herein) filed objection against the maintainability of appeal. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present
case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the Appeal which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings.
In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench