ARKO PRAVO DUTTA ALLIAS ARKO PRAVO DUTTA ROY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4508/2025 · 2025-08-18
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15475 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15475 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:24107 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4406 of 2025
-------
1. Santanu Mandal, son of Bablu Mandal, aged about 34 years, resident of Chitorpur, Old Malda Road, P.O. Old Malda, P.S. Malda, District Malda, West Bengal-732128. 2. Somnath Sharma @ Jay Prakash, son of Jitendar Sharma, aged about 22 years, resident of Station Road, Chitorpur, Old Malda, P.O. Old Malda SO, P.S. Malda, District Malda, West Bengal-732128. …... …. Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Informant
.…. …. Opp. Parties
With
B.A. No.4508 of 2025
-------
1. Arko Pravo Dutta @ Arko Pravo Dutta Roy, S/o Amaresh Dutta, aged about 30 years, resident of Tel Mundi Road, Old Malda, P.O. Old Malda SO, P.S. Malda, District Malda, West Bengal-732128. 2. Avishek Dutta, son of Amaresh Dutta, aged abut 23 years, resident of Tel Mundi Road, Old Malda, P.O. Old Malda SO, P.S. Malda, District Malda, West Bengal-732128. …... …. Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Informant
.…. …. Opp. Parties
-------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
-------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubhashis Rasik Soren, Advocate
Ms. Shobha Gloria Lakra, Advocate
Ms. Mrinalini Adela Tete, Advocate
Ms. Preeti Hembrom, Advocate
Ms. Singi Sharon Demta, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P. P.
Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.
--------
05/ Dated 18.08.2025
Heard the parties. Both these two bail applications arise out of the same police case and as such, these bail applications are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with F.I.R Nagri P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024, corresponding to Spl. POCSO Case No.58 of 2025, for the offence under Sections 127(2), 74, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S and Section 12 of POCSO Act, pending in the court of Sri Asif Equbal, learned AJC-IV-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Ranchi. On 16.09.2024, the informant had stayed at Kavyan Residency with his daughter. At about 10:00 p.m, he went outside to fetch food. When he returned, he found his daughter missing. It is alleged that the petitioners who were staying in
the adjacent room kidnapped his daughter. They took his daughter to their room and took her obscene pictures. His daughter somehow managed to escape. Attention has been drawn towards WhatsApp chat of the victim with one of the absconding accused.
Attention has also been drawn towards several photographs of the victim with one of the absconding accused, which shows that the victim was having very intimate relationship with co accused namely Suvendu Mandal. There is no allegation that the victim was subjected to any sexual atrocity. Mr. Rakesh Ranjan and Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned A.P. Ps on behalf of the State have opposed the prayer for bail. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Asif Equbal, learned AJC-IV-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Ranchi, in connection with F.I.R Nagri P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024, corresponding to Spl. POCSO Case No.58 of 2025. (Ambuj Nath, J.) BS/-