Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44276 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4475 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vasdev Shukla Respondent :- Consolidation Officer ,Bikapur, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bipin Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. on behalf of the State. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Present petition has been filed to decide the proceedings of case No.40/202554042345030066, under Rule 109 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (Vasdev vs. State of U.P.) pending before the Consolidation Officer, Bikapur, District Ayodhya. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 6. Considering the fact that the proceedings are underway and from the perusal of the writ petition, there is no disclosure of any extraordinary circumstance as to why this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the trial court to decide the same expeditiously. 7. This Court is conscious of the fact that the trial court/competent authority are burdened to heavy dockets and in a routine manner directions cannot be passed to the trial court/competent authority to decide any particular case out of turn expeditiously. It is when some extra ordinary circumstance is made out only then it would be appropriate for this Court to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There also liberty should be given to the petitioner to place his grievances before the trial court/competent authority who after looking into the urgency as well as dockets situation and pass appropriate orders to expedite the aforesaid matter. In the present case no such circumstances has been mentioned or made out requiring interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 8. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the aforesaid case before the trial court/competent authority. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial court/competent authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial court/competent authority is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable order thereupon in accordance with law. 9. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 10. With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench