Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154734 (ALL)

RAM KESHAN AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/859/2025 · 2025-07-29

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43880 Court No. - 29 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 859 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Keshan And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Bahadur,Shakti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed for the following main relief:- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court kindly may be pleased to quash the summoning order dated 15-05-2025 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate Purwa, Unnao, bearing crime no. 517 of 2024 u/s 115(2)/352/351(3)/110/117(2) Β.N.S., P.S. Maurawa, District- Unnao. (Annexure no-1). (State-vs-Ram Keshan & Others) It is further prayed that this Hon'ble court kindly may be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceedings of crime no. 517 of 2024 u/s 115(2)/352/351(3)/110/117(2) B.N.S., P.S. Maurawa, District- Unnao. (State-vs-Ram Keshan & Others)" 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench