KRISHNA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/7300/2025 · 2025-08-07
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154727 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154727 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45960-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7300 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sandeep Sharma,Shanker Lal Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. 'Vakalatnama' filed by Shri Lalit Shukla, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.3 and 'vakalatnama' filed by Shri Pankaj Patel, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.4 are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-respondents, Shri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.3 as well as Shri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to respondent no.5 is hereby dispensed with. 4. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayers:
"1. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the concerned respondent No-2&3 to initiate appropriate inquiry on the complaint of petitioner as well as other and take appropriate action against responsible person within stipulated period if their involvement is found in commission of financial irregularities, in the interest of justice. 2. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the concerned opposite party to consider and take
appropriate action on the complaint of petitioner as well as other person within stipulated period, in the interest of justice."
5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner being a member of Cooperative Society has made a complaint regarding irregularities committed by respondent no.5 to respondent no.2 i.e. Milk Commissioner, Dairy Development, Lucknow, U.P. Since his complaint is yet to be decided, this writ petition has been filed with the aforesaid prayers. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection, if any direction is issued for taking decision on the petitioner's complaint. 7. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 to consider the complaint made by the petitioner in accordance with law, if any in this regard, after giving an opportunity of hearing to respondent no.5 within a period of 12 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him. .
(Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench