REENA KUMARI AND ORS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR
Cr.M.P./133/2013 · 2025-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15469 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15469 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 133 of 2013
------
1. Reena Kumari
2. Sheonandan Kumar Sharma
3. Banty Kumar Sharma @ Banti Kumar … ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Bindubhusan Manjrawal
… … Opposite Parties
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR
-------- For the Petitioners
: Mr. Pawan Kr. Pathak, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P.
--------
Order No. 06 / Dated: 29th November, 2022
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present.
From perusal of the previous order it appears that the disputes between the parties have been compromised.
Since the matter is pending for a long time and even then no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to argue this case, therefore, it appears that the petitioners have lost the interest to pursue this case.
Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution.
J.Minj
(Navneet Kumar, J.)