Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154676 (ALL)

AMAR NATH v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER, ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA DIVISION AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/4538/2025 · 2025-07-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44073 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4538 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner, Administration, Ayodhya Division Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr.Surya Prakash Mishra,Anand Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents no.1 and Shri Mohan Singh, who has accepted notice on behalf of Gram Sabha- respondent no.3. 2. In view of the order proposed, notice to private respondents no. 2 and 4 to17, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration),Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Revision No. 1868/2024 filed under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 within stipulated period as it may be directed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the private respondent no.2 has filed revision before the respondent no.1 against the order dated 24.07.2024, whereby learned Naib Tehsildar, Ram Nagar, Ambedkar Nagar has mutated the name of petitioner and his brother i.e. proforma respondent no.4. 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2024 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the revision which has been filed only in 2024. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench