IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 542 Sukhwinder K State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 05.05.1995 with regard to the condition No.3 mentioned 2. Learned State counsel refers to preliminary objection No.1 that as a matter of fact as per Rules mentioned there granted after 5 years of service, while petitioner had still vide the impugned order application of the petitioner for admission to B.Sc. (Post Basic Nursing) Course for the Session 1995 albeit with the or promotion in service categorically accepted by her Magistrate on 12.07.1995 (Annexure P2) course and that too in the year 2003, challenge 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises 25.03.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6289 Date of decision: 25.03.2025 Kaur Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 05.05.1995 with regard to the condition No.3 mentioned Learned State counsel refers to preliminary objection No.1 that as a matter of fact as per Rules mentioned there granted after 5 years of service, while petitioner had still vide the impugned order application of the petitioner for admission to B.Sc. (Post Basic Nursing) Course for the Session 1995 with the impugned condition that she would not claim or promotion in service, on account of having done the said accepted by her by filing an affidavit, attested by the Executi Magistrate on 12.07.1995 (Annexure P2). H course and that too in the year 2003, challenge Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. ( AMAN Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6289-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.03.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 05.05.1995 with regard to the condition No.3 mentioned in it. Learned State counsel refers to preliminary objection No.1, to state that as a matter of fact as per Rules mentioned therein, Study Leave could only granted after 5 years of service, while petitioner had merely 2 years to her credit, still vide the impugned order application of the petitioner for admission to B.Sc. (Post Basic Nursing) Course for the Session 1995-97, was forwarded to the PGI condition that she would not claim any financial benefit on account of having done the said Course. This was affidavit, attested by the Executi . However, after completion of said course and that too in the year 2003, challenge has been made. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated to state only be 2 years to her credit, still vide the impugned order application of the petitioner for admission to B.Sc. orwarded to the PGI financial benefit was affidavit, attested by the Executive owever, after completion of said Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.03.26 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document