Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:11538 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS 3563/2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State.
Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate, for the respondent no. 2, 3 and 5.
Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Advocate, for the respondent no. 4.
(2) According to petitioner, he has made a complaint against respondent no. 6 that his family has encroached upon government land, therefore he is not eligible to hold office as Corporator in Nagar Nigam. The date of making such complaint is indicated as
6.11.2025.
(3) Learned State Counsel submits that petitioner has not made complaint to the appropriate authority. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner be directed to make complaint to competent authority.
(4) Writ petition is, accordingly,
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority by making a complaint in terms of Uttarakhand Municipal Corporation Act, 1959. If petitioner makes fresh complaint to the competent authority within ten days from today, decision thereupon shall be taken within six months thereafter.
(5) It goes without saying that person likely to be affected by the decision to be taken on petitioner’s complaint, shall also be given opportunity of hearing.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
23.12.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.12.23 19:00:53 +05'30'
2025:UHC:11538