Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154621 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR YADAV v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR, DISTT. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS

A227/4512/2025 · 2025-07-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44178 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4512 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Distt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suraj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 2 and Ms. Shruti Sahu who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3 and the same is taken on record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the court below/ Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Lucknow to decide the case bearing No. 25695/2025, Computerized Case No. T202510460225695, under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 Sri Krishna and others Vs. Mahipal and others pending before him before the court of Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Lucknow, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, contained as Annexure No.1 to the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1/Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Lucknow is desired to make all endeavor to decide the case bearing No. 25695/2025, Computerized Case No. T202510460225695, under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 Sri Krishna and others Vs. Mahipal and others, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioners undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench