Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154618 (ALL)

PRIYANKA YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF NATURAL GAS AND PETROLEUM DEPTT. NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS

CMRAD/142/2025 · 2025-09-01

Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 142 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. (C.M. Application No.1 of 2025) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the review application. 2. Heard. 3. We have gone through the affidavit in support of the application seeking condonation of delay in filing this review application. Cause shown is sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed and delay is condoned. (Order on memo of review application) 4. Heard. 5. Even if the affidavit was of a date subsequent to the application filed on 25.09.2023, it would not make much of a difference to the order which we Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Srawan Kumar Pandey, Madan Gopal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Priyanka Yadav .....Applicant(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Natural Gas And Petroleum Deptt. New Delhi And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) had passed. Apparently, no error has been pointed out which could persuade us to review our order dated 28.03.2025. 6. Accordingly, the review application is dismissed. September 1, 2025 Shanu/- CMRAD No. 142 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench