Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154602 (ALL)

ARCHANA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/8379/2025 · 2025-07-30

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43932 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8379 of 2025 Petitioner :- Archana Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Kumar,Sandeep Rawat,Simran Parveen,Suraj Kumar Bharti Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to 5. No notice is being issued to the respondent No.6 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.5 then the respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 30.7.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench