Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010147512024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2322/2024 N F RAILWAY REP. BY THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, CON/III/SCL, KAWNPUI, MIZORAM VERSUS 1: STATE OF MIZORAM AND ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOV.T OF MIZORAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, NEW CAPITAL COMPLEX, KHATLA, AIZAWL, MIZORAM 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLASIB DISTRICT MIZORAM 3:SH. JOHN ZOREMSIAMA S.O JEROME LALBIAKTLUANGA (L) RESIDENT OF BAIRABI KOLASIB DISTRICT MIZORAM 4:SH. ROBERT LALNUNDANGA S/O H.T ZAUVA (L) RESIDENT OF MISSION VENG AIZAWL MIZORAM 5:SMTI. KAPZAMI W/O LALPIANZUIA (L) RESIDENT OF BAIRABI NORTH KOLASIB DISTRICT MIZORAM 6:SMTI. K. MALSAWMTLUANGI W/O LALTHANGLURA (L) RESIDENT OF BAIRABI NORTH KOLASIB DISTRICT MIZORAM 7:SH. C. VANLALNGHAKA S/O KHAWKHUMA RESIDENT OF BAIRABI NORTH KOLASIB DISTRICT MIZORAM 8:SHRI LALHRUAIZELA S/O VANLALBUKA (L) RESIDENT OF RIMAWI VENG BAIRABI KOLASIB DISTRICT MIZORAM Page No.# 2/2 For the Applicant(s) : Mr. K.K. Medhi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Medhi, Central Government Counsel. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Borua, Govt. Advocate, Mizoram for respondent Nos.1 & 2. – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR 24.03.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) An affidavit is filed on behalf of the applicant regarding service of notice upon the respondent Nos.3 to 8 through paper publication. Taking into consideration the same, we are of the view that the service upon the respondent Nos.3 to 8 is complete through paper publication. None appears for the respondent Nos.3 to 8. The matter comes upon for consideration of the interlocutory application preferred on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to condone the delay of 48 days in filling the connected writ appeal. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the contents of the interlocutory application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 48 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Hence, the interlocutory application is allowed. The delay of 48 days in filling the connected writ appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission after 4(four) weeks. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant