SAMAYA LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
/4564/2025 · 2025-08-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154567 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45148 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4564 of 2025 Petitioner :- Samaya Lal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Ram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the application for interim relief filed by the petitioner in Appeal No. 1586 of 2025 U/S 24(4) read with Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Vinod Kumar & another Vs. Ramapati & another) against the
order dated 02.06.2025 expeditiously
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be redressed in case respondent No. 2 is
directed to consider and decide application for interim relief filed by the petitioner in Appeal No. 1586 of 2025 U/S 24(4) read with Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Vinod Kumar & another Vs. Ramapati & another) against the order dated 02.06.2025 in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2- Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide application for interim relief filed by the petitioner in Appeal No. 1586 of 2025 U/S 24(4) read with Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Vinod Kumar & another Vs. Ramapati & another) against the order dated 02.06.2025 within a period of three weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received
with regard to the respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench