SAMANTHA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/8380/2025 · 2025-08-01
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154564 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154564 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44602 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8380 of 2025 Petitioner :- Samantha Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kazim Ibrahim Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard Shri Kazim Ibrahim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents-State.
2. Considering that the order impugned has been passed by the Director, Education (Secondary), Prayagraj i.e. respondent No.2 as such no notice is being issued to the respondents No.5 & 6.
3. Under challenge is the order dated 22.10.2024, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, so far as it relates to the petitioner whereby her services have been dispensed with.
4. There is consensus at bar that the matter in issued has been considered by this Court in Writ A No.6116 of 2025 In Re Kumari Pankaj vs State of U.P. & Ors : 2025:AHC-LKO: 32197 whereby similar order has been set aside by this Court.
5. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 22.10.2024, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, so far as it relates to the petitioner is set aside.
6. It is provided that the petitioner shall be entitled to the benefit of the judgment of this Court in the case of Kumari Pankaj (supra). Order Date :- 1.8.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench