Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154533 (MAD)

R.Manikandan v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP(MD)/21186/2025 · 2025-08-04

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.21186 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :04.08.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD)No.21186 of 2025 R.Manikandan ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 2. The District Registrar (Admin), Office of the District Registrar, No.58/1, Cutchery Road, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned Refusal Check Slip issued by the 3rd respondent vide his proceedings RFL/Aruppukottai/27/2025 dated 14.07.2025 and to quash the same as illegal and consequentially, to direct the 3rd respondent to register the executed sale agreement presented by the petitioner within a stipulated time fixed by this 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.21186 of 2025 Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vidhya For Respondents : Mr.S.Saji Bino Special Government Pleader ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned Refusal Check Slip issued by the 3rd respondent vide his proceedings RFL/Aruppukottai/27/2025 dated 14.07.2025 and consequentially, to direct the 3rd respondent to register the executed sale agreement presented by the petitioner. 2. Through the impugned order, the respondents have traced the title and has stated that one Deivanaiammal is having four legal heirs. The respondents have also stated that the revenue documents also stand in the name of the four legal heirs. Therefore, the present sale agreement cannot be registered, which is executed by one of the legal heirs. 3.It is a settled proposition that revenue documents will not confer title. Through the impugned order, the respondents have determined the title of the other legal heirs, thereby acted as a Civil Court. Hence, the impugned refusal check slip is quashed and the respondents are directed to register the sale 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.21186 of 2025 agreement within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. 04.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Tmg To: 1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028. 2. The District Registrar (Admin), Office of the District Registrar, No.58/1, Cutchery Road, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.21186 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY , J. Tmg ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.21186 of 2025 DATED :04.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis