MONOO @ MONOO NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/962/2025 · 2025-08-04
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45119 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 962 of 2025 Applicant :- Monoo @ Monoo Nishad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Durga Prasad,Prabhakar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Shri Durga Prasad Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakerma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 161 of 2024, under Sections 74, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 B.N.S., 2023 and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Bewana, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 04.11.2024 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that the applicant entered the informant's house carrying a knife and threatened and molested the informant's daughter, aged 17 years. When the informant reached there, the applicant assaulted on his head with knife. When the informant's wife and other family members came there, the informant's wife was also caused an injury with the knife.
4. Three persons have suffered injuries in the incident, although none of the injuries is an incised wound.
5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that these allegations do not warrant
this court to exercise its jurisdiction by granting pre-arrest bail to the applicant. The application is accordingly rejected.
6. In case the applicant appears before the trial court and seeks his release on bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, keeping in view the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., (2022) 10 SCC 51. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench