Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Madhaik Abhushan Nirmata vs. Sunita Sharma Cr.MP(M) No.1207 of 2025
24.07.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for the respondent.
Memo of appearance filed. Time sought to file Power of Attorney. Needful be done within a period of four weeks. List thereafter. By way of the present application, the applicant, who is complainant, in this case, has sought the indulgence of this Court to grant leave to appeal. In view of decision of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in Manu/SC/0823/2025, in Criminal Appeal Nos.1868-1870 of 2025, titled as Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran & Others, requisite leave to appeal is accorded in favour of the applicant. Application is accordingly disposed of. Cr. Appeal No……...of 2025 Be registered.
Vide order of even date, passed in Cr.M.P.(M) No. 1207 of 2025, the requisite leave to appeal has been accorded in favour of the appellant. Certain arguable points are involved in the present petition, as such, the same is admitted for hearing.
Respondent is directed to furnish bail bonds, in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court within four weeks, by giving a solemn undertaking to surrender before this Court, or before the learned trial Court, in case of ultimate acceptance of the appeal, by this Court.
It is clarified that the respondent shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court.
(Virender Singh) Judge July 24, 2025 (subhash)