JYOTI PRAKASH RANJAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/4137/2020 · 2025-05-07
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74850 Court No. - 6
1. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4137 of 2020 Petitioner :- Jyoti Prakash Ranjan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
2. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14207 of 2020 Petitioner :- Sabhajeet Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lal Dev Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
3. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4199 of 2020 Petitioner :- Animesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
4. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4201 of 2020 Petitioner :- Raghuman Respondent :- State Of U.P.And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Kumar Mishra,Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
5. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4202 of 2020 Petitioner :- Suneel Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
6. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4203 of 2020 Petitioner :- Deepraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
7. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4534 of 2020 Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
8. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4620 of 2020 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
9. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4625 of 2020 Petitioner :- Dushyant Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
10. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4648 of 2020 Petitioner :- Deepika Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
11. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4819 of 2020 Petitioner :- Km.
Rekha @ Rekha Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shikher Trivedi,Shivendu Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vikram Bahadur Singh
12. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9063 of 2021 Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
13. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9064 of 2021 Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C.
14. Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11282 of 2020 Petitioner :- Dhananjay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha (Senior Adv),Shatrughan Sonwal,Shivendu Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Heard Sri Shatrughan Sonwal, learned counsel for petitioner in Writ Petition No.4137 of 2020, Sri Suresh Narain Pandey, on behalf of petitioner in Writ Petition No.11282 of 2020, Sri K.Shahi on behalf of respective respondent and Sri A.K.Singh Nagwanshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 2. In Writ Petition No.11282 of 2020, supplementary affidavit is taken on record
3. It is not under dispute that a similar case being WRIT-A No.- 18733 of 2019, Abhishek Kumar Bajpayee Vs.State Of U.P. And 3 Others, was dismissed vide order dated 17.1.2020. Relevant part thereof is mentioned hereinafter:
"19. In the case in hand, the petitioner did not approach this Court challenging the result of re-evaluation. The petitioner in order to avail the benefit of judgment of this court in the case of Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi (supra) in paragraph 20 of the writ petition has made a vague averment that he has received scanned copy in the month of November, 2019. The pleadings in this regard lacks material fact as to the date on which he has received scanned copy and the mode by which scanned copy was sent to him.
Thus, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that no cut off date is provided by this Court for making application for re- evaluation is misconceived as the process of re-evaluation cannot be allowed to be continued to infinity."
4. Learned counsel for the parties further submitted that aforesaid
order was subject matter of challenge in Special Appeal No.222 of 2020, Abhishek Kumar Bajpayee Vs. State Of U.P. Through the Additional Chief Secretary & 3 Others, which is still pending.
5. In the aforesaid circumstances, there is no reason for this Bench to take a contrary view as taken in Abhishek Kumar Bajpayee (supra) and since Special Appeal as referred above is still not been decided, therefore, all these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Abhishek Kumar Bajpayee (supra).
Order Date :- 8.5.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad