Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22641] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5089/2025 Prathviraj S/o Shri Narayan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Kodyai, Tehsil Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur, Presently Tenant Room No. 1, House No. 43, Agrasen Vihar, Shriram Ki Nangal, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. N. Khinchi with Mr. Kishan Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.GA.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 30/05/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.226/2025 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, Jaipur City (South), for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20 and 21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no criminal case of a similar nature is pending. He further submits that charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner and he is in judicial custody since 27.03.2025 and the trial will take considerable time; therefore, further custody of the petitioner
[2025:RJ-JP:22641] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5089/2025] would not serve any fruitful purpose. Therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner and there is no criminal case of a similar nature is pending against the petitioner; considering the period of custody, but without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Prathviraj S/o Shri Narayan shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence of similar nature during currency of the bail
[2025:RJ-JP:22641] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5089/2025] and he shall mark his presence in first week of every two months in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9.
If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/212