Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010147092018 2025:GAU-AS:10574 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4556/2018 PRASANTA DUTTA S/O. LT. SURENDRA NATH DUTTA, RESIDENT OF AASTHA ENCLAVE (5A), OPPOSITE G.L. PUBLICATION, ULUBARI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI- 781007, P.O. ULUBARI, P.S. PALTAN BAZAR, DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, SKILL EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6. 2:THE DIRECTOR EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMEN TRAINING ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI- 781008. 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (I/C) THE DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMEN TRAINING ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI- 781008. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT (ITI) INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE GORGAON DIST. SIBSAGAR ASSAM For the petitioner (s) : Mr. S. R. Rabha, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. S. P. Das, Advocate Mr. M. Chetia, Govt. Advocate Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 11.08.2025 Heard Mr. S. R. Rabha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. M. Chetia, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.1; Mr. S. P. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4. 2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court on account of non-payment of various amounts i.e. Rs.71,41,492/-; Rs. 69,64,712/- and Rs. 71,63,437/- against the works carried out by the petitioner. 3. Mr. S. P. Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4 submits that the said amounts have been duly paid to the petitioner, and in that regard, has placed before this Court the FoCs in respect to the said amount of Rs.71,63,437/-; Rs.72,13,034/- and Rs.69,64,712/-. The same are kept on record and marked with the letters “X”, “Y” and “Z”. 4. Taking into account the statement made by the learned Page No.# 3/3 counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2, 3, and 4 and the documents which have been placed on record and marked with the letters “X”, “Y” and “Z”, this Court is of the opinion that nothing further survives in the instant writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant