Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154471 (ALL)

MALATI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/7262/2025 · 2025-07-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44186 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7262 of 2025 Petitioner :- Malati Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Onkar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to ensure the compliance of order dated 27.06.2023 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikapur, District - Ayodhya in proceedings arising out of Section 24 of U.P. revenue Code, 2006 through execution proceeding Under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual expeditiously. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner is recorded tenure holder of plot No. 149 and she had initiated the proceeding of demarcation of boundaries of chak and proceeding was finalised vide order dated 27.06.2023 and demarcation report was submitted on 18.05.2023 and the same was affirmed by S.D.M. It is in the aforesaid circumstances a prayer has been made for a direction to State respondents to ensure the compliance of order dated 27.06.2023 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikapur, District - Ayodhya in proceedings arising out of Section 24 of U.P. revenue Code, 2006 5. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition and has submitted that petitioner has efficacious remedy of filing an application U/S 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for complying with the orders passed by revenue authorities. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he does not want to press the writ petition and seeks liberty to move appropriate application U/S 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for direction to comply with the direction of order dated 27.06.2023 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikapur, District - Ayodhya 7. Accordingly, in light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application U/S 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual and in case such an application is moved within two weeks from today, the competent authority shall proceed to consider and decide the the same expeditiously in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench