Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154470 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/6844/2025 · 2025-07-29

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43914-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6844 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Affairs Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilendra Singh,Anurag Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. This writ petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. No.378 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2) and 352 of of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Madiyaon, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest the petitioners, which is against the mandates of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 4. Learned AGA appearing for the State/opposite parties has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offences allegedly committed by the petitioners entail sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Sangeeta Chandra, J.) Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench