( 2025:JHHC:14414 ) Page-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4401 of 2025 1. Ramlal Yadav, aged about 40 years, Son of Sukhdev Yadav 2. Vikash Ganjhu, aged about 27 years, Son of Sarichar Ganjhu 3. Rajgeer Ganjhu, aged about 42 years, Son of Jagdish Ganjhu, all are resident of Village-Eghara, Falerdra, P.O.-Kawra, P.S.- Pralappur, District- Chatra, Jharkhand. 4. Vishambhar Yadav, aged about 51 years, Son of Late Matar Yadav, resident of Village- Anlakala, P.O.-Dagua, P.S.- Naudiha Bazar, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. .... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, A.P.P. --------- Order No. 02/Dated: 03rd June, 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioners for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 18, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 33 of the I.F. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case, only on the basis of confessional statement of accused persons. No incrementing article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners that the petitioners have cultivating opium in forest land. He further submits that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent and except that there is no criminal case pending against the petitioners. Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 19.04.2025. As such, he may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against the petitioners, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners named above are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ( 2025:JHHC:14414 ) Page-2 court of Special Judge under N.D.P.S. Act, Palamau in connection with Manatu P.S. Case No. 27 of 2025 giving rise to N.D.P.S. No. 21 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that till commencement of trial, the petitioners shall report to the local police station every month and after commencement of trial, they shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and they shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the petitioners, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioners. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Simran-Aditi/