Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010137732025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2196/2025 in WP(C) 6990/2023 NASIR UDDIN LASKAR SON OF SANGAI MIA LASKAR VILLAGE AND PO NATUN DAYAPUR PS UDHARBOND DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788009 2: KORIMA BEGUM LASKAR W/O. LATE AJOL ALI LASKAR R/O. VILLAGE KASHIPUR PART II P.O. NATUN DAYAPUR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM PIN CODE 788009 3: RABAL HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O. SANGAI MIA LASKAR VILLAGE AND P.O. NATUN DAYAPUR P.S. UDHARBOND DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. PIN CODE 788009 4: NUR AHMED MAZUMDAR S/O. AMIR UDDIN MAZUMDAR VILLAGE HARINAGAR P.O. HARINAGAR BAZAR P.S. HARINAGAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. PIN CODE 788107 5: NUR ESSA BEGUM MAZUMDAR W/O. HAIDER HUSSAIN LASKAR VILLAGE NATUN DAYAPUR P.O. NATUN DAYAPUR
Page No.# 2/4 P.S. UDHARBOND DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. PIN CODE 788009 6: JAINAL ABEDIN BARBHUIYA SON OF LATE SAFIL UDDIN BARBHUIYA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NATUN DAYAPUR CHOWK PO NATUN DAYAPUR PS UDHARBOND DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788009 7: SAMSUDDIN MAZUMDAR SON OF ABDUL HOQUE MAZUMDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BERENGA PART V PO BERENGA DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788005 VERSUS SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O ILAS ALI BARBHUIYA R/O RONGPUR PART 1 P.O. ARKATIPUR P.S.
SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR 2:SAIF UDDIN BARBHUYA S/O ILAS ALI BARBHUIYA R/O RONGPUR PART 1 P.O. ARKATIPUR P.S.
SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. 3:SAMIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O ILAS ALI BARBHUIYA R/O RONGPUR PART 1 P.O. ARKATIPUR P.S.
SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 4:AJIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O ILAS ALI BARBHUIYA R/O RONGPUR PART 1 P.O. ARKATIPUR P.S.
SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 5:FAYAJ UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O ILAS ALI BARBHUIYA R/O RONGPUR PART 1 P.O. ARKATIPUR P.S.
SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. R MAJUMDAR Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for SAHAB UDDIN BARBHUIYA
Page No.# 3/4
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 11.08.2025
1. Heard Mr. J.U.N.M. Laskar, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. The present application is filed by the applicants for impleadment of their names as respondent Nos.12 to 18 in WP(C) No.6990/2023. 3. In WP(C) No.6990/2023, a grievance is raised by the petitioners that despite being the owners of the parcels of land which have been acquired by the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MoRT&H), Government of India for the purpose of construction of National Highway No.306, the petitioners’ names have not been included in the notification issued under Section 3D of the National Highways Act, 1956. 4.
Accordingly, while issuing notice of motion vide order dated 18.12.2023, a direction was issued to the effect that disbursement of compensation amount in respect of the subject plot shall be kept in abeyance till the returnable date. 5. The applicants also claim their right over the subject- land. Accordingly, the present impleadment petition is filed. 6. Perused the pleadings in the writ petition as well as the pleadings made in the present application. 7. After perusal of the same, this court is of the opinion that
Page No.# 4/4 the applicants may be necessary parties in determining the connected writ petition. 8. Mr. S Borthakur, learned counsel for the respondent has also not objected in the impleadment of the present applicants as respondent Nos.12 to 18. 9. Accordingly, the present application stands allowed by impleading the applicants as respondent Nos.12 to 18 in the connected writ petition. 10. The applicants shall furnish an amended cause title before the Registry with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the petitioners and thereafter the necessary impleadment be carried out as per the existing CIS norms. 11. The I.A stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant