Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154446 (ALL)

CHANDRA BHUSHAN MISHRA AND 48 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/8367/2025 · 2025-07-29

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43684 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8367 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Bhushan Mishra And 48 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kameshwar Nath Gupta,Harsh Mohan,Ram Achal Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kumar Ayush Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard. 2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. The petitioners who are Assistant Teachers claim payment of gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1972'). 4. Learned Standing Counsel and Shri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel appearing for respondents state that this aspect of the matter has been considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.41 of 2025 In Re Bindra Prasad Patel vs State of U.P. & Ors, decided on 08.07.2025 wherein Division Bench has held that the teachers (including Headmaster) of the basic school cannot be held to be an employee under Section 2(e) of the Act, 1972 and thus, the benefits available to an employee under the Act, 1972 would not be available to such a teacher. 5. Keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench in the case of Bindra Prasad Patel (supra), no case for interference is made out. 6. The writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench