ANAMIKA GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY DEPTT., LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/8354/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154432 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154432 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45310 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8354 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anamika Gautam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt., Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prince Singh,Dinesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Saran,Neerav Chitravanshi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State, and Dr Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4. Notice on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3 has been accepted by Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, Advocate and Shri Alok Saran, Advocate respectively. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. The petitioner has staked her claim for compassionate appointment on account of death of her husband namely Shri Anil Kumar Bharti who was working under respondents No.3 & 4 and died in harness on
10.08.2022. Despite the petitioner having applied her claim for compassionate appointment, her claim has not been considered and hence the petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.3 which may be
directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.3 then the respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench