Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154423 (ALL)

RAMAVATI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

/6866/2025 · 2025-08-05

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45288-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6866 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramavati And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Srivastava,Ashok Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Avinash Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G. D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents. 3. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No. 2 & 3 to not harass and not to interfere in peaceful living of the petitioners. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned higher authorities to take appropriate action against the erring officials who are illegally harassing and threatening the petitioners." 4. At the very outset, Sri G. D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. has shown a copy of the instruction letter dated 31.3.2025 provided by Sri Amit Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station Jagatpur, Raebareli indicating therein that the petitioners are not being harassed by the police in any manner whatsoever. Sri Bhatt has further submitted that the daughter-in-law of the present petitioners had filed one application against them and after making inquiry of the aforesaid allegations, the allegations were not found to be substantial, therefore, no FIR was lodged against them and a report dated 30.10.2025 was sent to the Superintendent of Police, Raebareli, which is annexed as Annexure No. SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. 5. Sri Bhatt has further submitted that thereafter one application under RTI Act has been filed by the advocate of the petitioners on 27.05.2025 to District Probation Officer, Mahila and Bal Vikas Vibhag, Raebareli indicating therein that since the petitioners' daughter-in-law has entered into a compromise, the police is doing some exercise, therefore, copy of the compromise be provided to him. On such application, the reply has been provided that letter dated 04.07.2025 enclosing therewith a copy of the letter dated 16.06.2025 preferred by the Circle Officer, Dalmau, Raebareli addressing to the Superintendent of Police, Raebareli apprising the facts and circumstances of the issue in question indicating therein that the allegation was levelled by the dauther-in-law of the present petitioners have not been found prima facie proved, therefore, no further exercise has been undertaken. 6. In the light of the aforesaid development, it appears that the petitioners are not being harassed in any manner whatsoever and the apprehension of the petitioner is unwarranted, however, it is needless to day that no citizen may be harassed by any authority, be it police or any other administrative authority, without having any cogent reason or material to that effect. 7. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 (Manoj K.) (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench