APHC010197572019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8571/2019 Between: 1. GUMMADI MUTYALA DEVI, W/O SUBBAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-21, KODURU VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DENDULURU P.S., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI NAGABHUSHANAM, S/O V.NARASIMHA RAO, AGED MAJOR, R/O TADIKALAPUDI VILLAGE, KOLLUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI ABBURI GOPI KRISHNA, S/O SATTAIAH, AGED MAJOR, R/O RAMARAOGUDEM VILLAGE, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. SRI MEDIBOINA KONDAIAH, S/O RAMULU, AGED MAJOR, R/O MEDINARAOPALEM VILLAGE, DENDULURU MANDAL, W.GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 7. SRI KALI DAVID, S/O BHEEMUDU, AGED MAJOR, R/O RAMARAOGUDEM VILLAGE, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. BANDI GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED MAJOR, R/O CHALLACHINTALAPUDI VILLAGE, DENDULURU MANDAL, W.GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PRANATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8571 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the non-registration of FIR by the respondents no.2 and 3 against the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.04.2019 and 01.06.2019, as being arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional and consequentially direct the respondents no.2 and 3 to register FIR against respondents no.4 to 8 herein as per the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.04.2019 and 01.06.2019 and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Ms.S.Pranathi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 20.08.2025 Pmk 4 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:8571 OF 2019 Date: 20.08.2025 Pmk