RAJMANI THRU. HIS SON RAM MANI TIWARI v. LEARNED ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AYODHYA MANDAL AYODHYA AND 47 OTHERS
A227/4769/2025 · 2025-08-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154413 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154413 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46473
Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4769 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajmani Thru. His Son Ram Mani Tiwari Respondent :- Learned Additional Commissioner Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya And 47 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Tiwari,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.27- Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Revision No.503/2024, computerized case No.C202404000000503 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code (Srimati Meera Devi Vs. Umashankar), expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Revision No.503/2024, computerized case No.C202404000000503 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code (Srimati Meera Devi Vs. Umashankar) expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing
which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 8.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench