Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44085 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4534 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramyagya And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vaibhav Shukla,Pankaj Kumar Tiwari,Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents no.1 and Shri Mohan Singh, who has accepted notice on behalf of Gram Sabha- respondent no.2. 2. In view of the order proposed, notice to private respondents no. 3 to 33, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to issue a direction commanding the learned Board of Revenue (Court concerned) to decide the Second Appeal No. R-2024042300711 under Section 208 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by name of Krishan Dev Mishra and others vs. Ram Yagya and others, filed by respondent nos. 3-5, in which the petitioners herein are respondents no. 1-3, expeditiously within a fixed period which may be deemed proper by this Honb'le Court in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted that being aggrieved by the order dated 27.01.2024 and Decree/ judgment dated 06.09.2023 passed by learned Additional Commissioner (Administrative) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya the respondents filed Second Appeal before the learned Board of Revenue on 23.02.2024. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2024 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the Second Appeal which has been filed only in 2024. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioners expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench