Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154384 (ALL)

SMT. GAYTRI DEVI v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 3 OTHERS

A227/4463/2025 · 2025-07-29

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43609 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4463 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Gaytri Devi Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla,Shyam Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Board of Revenue Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow through its Chairman, to consider and decide the interim relief application dated 21.05.2025 in Revision No. 2259/2025, Smt. Gayatri Devi Vs. Vimlesh Kumari and others within stipulated period, as contained as Annexure No.1 to this petition, as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the revision preferred by the petitioner has been admitted but no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 5. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next six weeks. 7. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 8. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench