Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11429 of 2017 ====================================================== Mohan Ram Son of Sri Tapeshwar Ram, Resident of Village- Jaiyan, P.S. Siwan Mufassil, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Chairman, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna.
3. The Member Board of Revenue, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Collector, Siwan.
5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, District Siwan.
6. Jarina Khatoon wife of Saukat Ali
7. Sri Niwas Prasad son of Late Shiv Pujan Prasad Both Resident of Village P.O.- Jaiyan, P.S. District- Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kr. Pd. Gp14 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The writ petition has been filed for:-
“issuance a writ or any appropriate writ/order or direction directing and commanding to the Respondent, particularly to the Respondent no. 2 being the last fact finding Court of Ceiling matter, to hear the case on merit which was filed before him in B.L.T. Case no. 166 of 2015 and by the order dated 25/08/2015 of the Chairman, Bihar Land
Patna High Court CWJC No.11429 of 2017(2) dt.22-04-2025 2/2 Tribunal Patna, the relief Prayed by the petitioner has been dismissed and affirm the
order of Board of Revenue Patna without applying Judicial mind in the interest of Justice holding therein" that the case dannot be permitted for infinite time and restoration after restora-tion cannot be in the interest of Justice
", which is subject matter to set-aside the order dated 25/08/2015 on technical ground of restoration as contained in Annexure-3, as well the orders passed by Addl. Member Board of Revenue, Patna as contained in Annexure-1 and 2 respectively.
3. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is no more.
4. In that background, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the heirs of the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of their grievance.
perwez/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U