Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15437 (AP)

B.Satyanarayana, v. Sri Sashibushan Kumar, IAS,

CC/1070/2025 · 2025-06-26

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010196872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SMS FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1070 OF 2025 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under the Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for the violation of the Order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.6423 of 2025 dt. 13.03.2025 Between; B.Satyanarayana, S/o. Lakshminarayana, Aged 71 years, Occ Sarpanch R/o. Peddakandlagunta Village, Kondapi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri Sashibushan Kumar IAS, Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Secretariat Buildings at Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Sri M Krishna Teja IAS, Commissioner and Director, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, PVS Icon Buildings, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. Smt. A Thameem Ansariya, District Collector Ongole. Prakasam District, % 4. Sri G Venkata Naidu, District Panchayat Officer, Prakasam District, Ongole. Smt. R Padma, Divisional Panchayat Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. Sri B Ramanjaneyulu, Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Kondapi Mandal, Prakasam District. Smt. M Anjali Devi, Extension Officer (PR and RD) Kondapi, Prakasam District. Sri P Sambaiah, Panchayat Secretary, Peddakandlagunta Village, Kondapi Mandal, Prakasam District. 5. 6. 7. 8. li 6 f ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V VINOD K REDDY I Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3 & 4: SRI RAMA RAO KOCHIRI I Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8: SRI MATTEGUNTA SUDHIR, Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps, M.P.Ps, Gram Panchayats The Court made the following order: APHC010196872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Sffl’S [3459] I j 5 FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1070/2025 Between: B.satyanarayana, ...PETITIONER AND Sri Sashibushan Kumar las and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor{S): 1.RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2.MATTEGUNTA SUDHIR, STANDING COUNSEL FOR Z.P.PS, M.P.PS GRAM PANCHAYATS THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders passed in W.P.No.6423 of 2025 are complied with and no further orders are required in this matter. 2. Recording, the above submission, this Contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. # sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any. pending shall stand closed*. As a Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ny SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Sri Sashibushan Kumar IAS, Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department Secretariat Buildings at Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Sri M Krishna Teja IAS, Commissioner and Director, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, PVS Icon Buildings, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. Smt. A Thameem Ansariya, District Collector, Ongole. 4. Sri G Venkata Naidu, District Panchayat Officer Ongole. 5. Smt. R Padma, Divisional Panchayat Officer, District. 6. Sri B Ramanjaneyulu, Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Kondapi Mandal, Prakasam District. 7. Smt. M Anjali Devi, Extension Officer (PR and RD) Kondapi, Prakasam District. 8. Sri P Sambaiah, Panchayat Secretary Kondapi Mandal, Prakasam District. 9. One CC to Sri. V Vinod K Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Rama Rao Kochiri, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Mattegunta Sudhir, Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps, M.P.Ps, Gram Panchayats [OPUC] Two CD Copies Prakasam District, Prakasam District, Ongole, Prakasam Peddakandlagunta Village 10. 11. 12. LRV sree HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 ORDER CC NO. 1070 OF 2025 ^ 19 SEP 2025 rrentSectiooxCy^ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS