RAM JYAWAN v. MANAGING DIRECTOR (URBAN ) U.P. JAL NIGAM LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/8361/2025 · 2025-07-29
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43712 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8361 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Jyawan Respondent :- Managing Director (Urban ) U.P. Jal Nigam Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr.Ved Prakash,Mukul Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.01.2025, his retiral dues have still not been paid to him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.1 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.1 then the respondent no.1 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 29.7.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench