Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15434 (RAJ)

SHASHANK JORWAL S/O SHRI ROOPAN RAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5666/2025 · 2025-05-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22497] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5666/2025 Shashank Jorwal S/o Shri Roopan Ram Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Darshan Dental College And Hospital, Loyara, Udaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Through Its Registrar, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. Rajasthan 302033 3. The Controller Examination, Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302033 4. Darshan Dental College And Hospital, Through Its Principal, Ranakpur Road, Village-Loyara, Udaipur 313011 (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Tanveer Ahamad with Mr.V. K. Singh, Ms.Prachi Singh & Mr.Saurav Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Yash Joshi Mr.Jai Raj Tantia JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/05/2025 1. Matter come up on an application (I/A No.1/2025) submitted by the petitioner-applicant with the prayer for issuing direction against the respondent-University to change the examination [2025:RJ-JP:22497] (2 of 3) [CW-5666/2025] centre of the petitioner to any Government Dental College of PUC Examination (Internal) and also of theory paper of Periodontology. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that college administration, where the petitioner is studying, is having personal grudges against him so, the petitioner is under apprehension that he may meet with any unwanted circumstances, therefore, in order to avoid the said eventuality, direction sought for in the application be issued. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposed the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner and submits that for theory examination, the examination centre assigned to the petitioner is Government College of Nursing M.B. Government Hospital, Udaipur and for Internal Examination, the examination centre is assigned to R.R. Dental College, Udaipur, hence, there is no basis for any apprehension, in the mind of the petitioner, hence, the application submitted by the petitioner is liable to be rejected. 4. Heard and considered the submissions. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the counsel for the parties, this Court is not inclined to change the examination centre of the petitioner for appearing in theory paper, but so far as the second prayer with regard to the Internal Examination of the petitioner is concerned and looking to the fact that the petitioner is having apprehension of any untoward incident, in the interest of justice, the respondents are directed to change the centre of the petitioner for PUC Examination (Internal) R.R. Dental College, Udaipur to RUHS Government College, Jaipur. 6. Accordingly, the misc. application stands disposed of. [2025:RJ-JP:22497] (3 of 3) [CW-5666/2025] 7. Since appropriate orders have been passed in the miscellaneous application now, nothing survives in the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /267