CHANDRA KIRAN @ CHANDRA KIRAN MISHRA v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS
A227/4513/2025 · 2025-07-30
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154339 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154339 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44026 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4513 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Kiran @ Chandra Kiran Mishra Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents no. 3 to 6, is dispensed with.
2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:-
"Issue an order or direction to the learned Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Revision No. 202554044400000076" under Section 48 of U.P. Consolidation and Holdings Act, (Chandra Kiran Vs. Kamlesh and others), which is pending since 02.05.2025 within the time specified by this Hon'ble Court.
3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the revision preferred by the petitioner has been admitted but no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served.
4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.
5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next six weeks.
6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter.
7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench