Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44269 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8257 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Vibha Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Bal Vikas Pushtahar Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 6, Mr. Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 7 today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Petition has been filed challenging appointment of respondent no. 7 Smt. Sarita Yadav wife of Dharmendra Kumar Tiwari as Anganbadi Karyakatri for the village in question and further a direction for consideration for selection on the said post. 3. It has been submitted that respondent no. 7 has been appointed under 'below poverty line category' but same is on the basis of a incorrect income certificate. It has been further submitted that petitioner has already submitted a representation for cancellation of the said income certificate, which is yet pending consideration. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for final decision with regard to same. 5. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 28.07.2025, a copy of which is taken on record, and as per chart, petitioner, who had also applied under the 'below poverty line category' obtained 12.956 marks and respondent no. 7 obtained 13.608 marks and therefore respondent no. 7 was considered. 6. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material available on record, it is evident and admitted that respondent no. 7 has been selected on the basis of her income certificate under the 'below poverty line category' and such a certificate has not yet been cancelled by any competent authority. 7. In view thereof, this Court does not find any occasion to grant indulgence in the matter and petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his application preferred for cancellation of income certificate of respondent no. 7. 8. Resultantly at this stage, petition fails and is dismissed. 9. Parties to bear their own costs. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench