RAVI DEV BAJPAI and OTHERS U/A 227 v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE COURT NO. 8 HARDOI and OTHERS
A227/6414/2013 · 2025-04-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154330 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154330 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20987 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6414 of 2013 Petitioner :- Ravi Dev Bajpai And Others U/A 227 Respondent :- Additional District Judge Court No. 8 Hardoi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Nath Tilhari,Alok Kumar Srivastava,Bajhul Quamar Siddiqui,Shiv Nath Tilhari,Yogesh Kesarwani Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Alok Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. No one appears even in the revised call. Even otherwise, the petition arises out of an order passed on the Injunction Application. As the order impugned has been affirmed by the revisional authority, I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned
order. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 15.4.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench