Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15433 (KAR)

SRI. SRINIVASA V v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3892/2020 · 2025-01-23

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3005 WP No. 3892 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3892 OF 2020 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: SRI. SRINIVASA.V, S/O LATE VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT SUBEDARANAKEREDODDI, HAROHALLI HOBLI, GOTTIGERE POST, KANAKAPURA (TALUK), RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 112. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.VIDYASAGAR.H.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.KEMPARAJU., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE FOREST DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, (PCCF), 2ND FLOOR, MALLESHWARAM, ARANYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, CAUVERY WILDLIFE DIVISION, KOLLEGALA, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571 440. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3005 WP No. 3892 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Vidyasagar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Kemparaju., for the petitioner and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Vidyasagar., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43