Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010146512025 2025:GAU-AS:10529 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2492/2025 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW ASSURANCE BUILDING 87, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, MUMBAI, AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICES AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, GUWAHATI-781005, NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR, G.S ROAD, ULUBARI. VERSUS ARATI HAZARIKA AND 4 ORS. W/O. LT. SADANANDA HAZARIKA 2:PRANAMTI HAZARIKA D/O. LT. SADANANDA HAZARIKA 3:SOURAV JYOTI HAZARIKA S/O. LT. SADANANDA HAZARIKA ALL ARE R/O. VILL.- GAMES VILLAGE BLOCK-A/ FLAT NO. 603 LALMATI BORSOJAI BELTOLA P/S. BASISTHA GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781029. 4:AINUL HAQUE S/O. LT. SALIMUDDIN R/O. VILL.- HOUSE NO. 23 DARANDHA PANJABARI ROAD SIX MILE Page No.# 2/4 P/S. DISPUR GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781037. 5:UMANANDA MILI S/O. LT. KAMAN MILI R/O. VILL.- MAJULI KARKICHUK MISSING GAON P/S. JENGRAIMUKH DIST. MAJULI ASSAM PIN-785106 Advocate for the Petitioner : A BIYANI, S CHOUDHURY,MR. R K BHATRA Advocate for the Respondent : DR. U BARUAH (R-1,2,3), MR D MONDAL(R-1,2,3) Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ASSAM VERSUS ARATI HAZARIKA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR SUNIL KUMAR CHAKMA Advocate for : appearing for ARATI HAZARIKA Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 11.08.2025 1. Ms. A Biyani, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant is present. 2. Mr. D Mondol, learned counsel has entered appearance for respondents 1, 2 & 3. 3. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 29(twenty-nine) days in preferring the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 19.03.2025 passed in MAC Case No. 2155/2017 by the Ld. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No. 3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati. 4. Ms. A Biyani, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant has referred to paragraph Nos. 4 to 9 of the application where the cause for delay is shown. 5. Mr. D Mondol, learned counsel who has entered appearance for respondents 1, 2 & 3 has not objected to the condonation application and submits that the matter may be heard on merits. 6. Accordingly, the delay of 29(twenty-nine) days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned. 7. In terms of the above observation, this application stands disposed of. 8. In view of the disposal of the present application, the main appeal may be registered and the same may be listed after 3(three) weeks. 9. The name of Mr. D Mondol, learned counsel may be reflected in the cause list as learned counsel for respondent No. 1, 2 & 3. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant