Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154289 (ALL)

SHIV DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4519/2025 · 2025-07-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44163 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4519 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar,Maneesh Kumar Chaube Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 2. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to respondent nos. 3 and 4, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya, to decide the recall application in Case No. T2022042300169, Shiv Devi Vs. Rajkumar, under Rule 34 Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006, which is pending since 19.01.2022. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya is desired to make all endeavor to decide the recall application in Case No. T2022042300169, Shiv Devi Vs. Rajkumar, under Rule 34 Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench