Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45121 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 712 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhadrasen Singh And 5 Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Sultanpur And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh,Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents no. 3 to 11, is dispensed with. 3. By means of present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed the following reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 16.05.2025 passed by opposite party no.1 in the interest of justice, annexed as Annexure No.1 to this petition. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding opposite party no.2 not to implement the order dated 04.05.2011 and stop the further proceeding in Case No. 307 in Rule No. 109A of U.P. C.H. Act in the interest of justice. (iii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite parties not to disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the land in dispute in pursuance of the impugned order dated 16.05.2025 passed by opposite party n.1 in the interest of justice." 4. The dispute in the present case is related to Gata No. 511 Khata No. 126, situated at Village Lakhipur, Pargana Meeranpur, District Sultanpur, which according to the petitioners is the ancestral property. It has further been stated that the property was mortgaged in favour of father of respondents no. 8 and 9, namely, Bajinath and subsequently even after the mortgaged was redeemed but the name of Baijnath was remained on record, due to present litigation is pending before the Deputy Director of Consolidation. 5. It is in the revision preferred by the petitioners, in Case No. 0355 of 2025, that the interim order has been declined to be passed and it has been noticed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation that on the previous occasion when the matter has been placed before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, interim order was passed due to matter remained pending for 13 years. Accordingly learned counsel for the petitioners confines his arguments for issuing a suitable direction to the Deputy Director of Consolidation to decide the revision, expeditiously. 6. Considering the material on record as per the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court has found that the respondents in the revision has already been appeared before the Deputy Director of Consolidation and the matter is to be heard, accordingly. 7. Let said revision be decided expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced. The petitioners undertake that they will cooperate in the said proceedings. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the instant petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench