Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45162 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4552 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manish Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Chaubey,Amit Bhardwaj,Gaurav Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for parties, the matter is heard and decided at the admission stage itself. 3. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for an order to respondents to complete demarcation proceeding including by putting stone inscription or stone boundary marker (Pattar Nasab) in respect of gata no. 534 admeasuring area 0.394 hectare situated at Village Raheempur Badauli, Pargana - Mangalsi, Tehsil - Sohawal, District -Ayodhya in view of order dated 17.02.2025 passed by Sub- Divisional Officer, Sohawal, District Ayodhya. 4. It has been submitted that the Sub- Divisional Officer, Sohwal District - Ayodhya has passed the order for demarcation of the aforesaid land of the petitioner as well as putting stone inscription or stone boundary marker (Patthar Nasab) on that demarcated land but no action has been taken place yet and till date the said order has not been complied with despite the fact that the same has not been assailed before any higher authority or forum. 5. In the aforesaid facts, a prayer has been made for a direction to the respondent-officials to execute the said orders. 6. Learned Standing on the other hand has opposed the writ petition and has submitted that there is adequate alternative remedy available to the petitioner under Para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual where the orders of the revenue authorities may be executed and there is no extraordinary circumstance submitted by the petitioner for interference of this Court in its power under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India. 7. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner also submits that he may be granted liberty to move an application before the appropriate authority to execute the orders for eviction passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Sohwal District - Ayodhya. 8. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application under Para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual for executing the order for demarcation and in case such an application is made, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench