Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15426 (RAJ)

RADHAVALLABH ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/7490/2019 · 2025-02-04

Avneesh Jhingan, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4907-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7490/2019 Radhavallabh Ispat Private Limited, A Company Duly Incorporated And Registered Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956 And Having Its Registered Office At 39, Paschimi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi- 110057 Through Its Authorised Signatory Himanshu Agarwal. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, District Jaipur-302005 (Raj.) 2. Inspector General, Registration And Stamps, Panjiyan Bhawan, Lohagal- Janana Hospital Road, Sikar Road, District Ajmer-305001 (Raj.) 3. Dy. Inspector General, Registration And Stamps, Alwar-1, District Alwar (Raj.) 4. Office Of Sub-Registrar Bhiwadi, Bhiwadi, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ankit Popli & Ms.Shreya Dangayach for Mr.Sunil Nath For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kartikaya Sharma for Mr.Sandeep Taneja,AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 04/02/2025 AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.[ORAL]:- 1. This petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents to refund excess stamp duty recovered, along with the interest. [2025:RJ-JP:4907-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-7490/2019] 2. The grievance raised is that the application of petitioner for refund of excess stamp duty is pending since 16.03.2018 and the respondents have not decided the same. 3. The petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to decide the application of the petitioner for refund of excess stamp duty, in accordance with law and within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the application has already been decided by the respondents, the petitioner shall be communicated the order. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/sunita/21