Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15426 (PAT)

Shashi Bhushan Pandey v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/1664/2022 · 2025-01-16

Anjani Kumar Sharan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1664 of 2022 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Pandey Son of Late Nand Lal Pandey Resident of 2nd Floor, Quarter no. 6, Ward no. 25, M.S. College Campus, Chandmari, Motihari, P.S. Motihari, District- Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice - Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Principal, Munci Singh College, Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devi Das Srivastava, Adv. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (Sc13) : Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC13 For the University : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 6 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the University. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a detailed representation before the Respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievance, but till date no order has been passed by the Respondent No.2. 3. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the Respondent No. 2 along with all supporting documents within a period of two weeks and the Respondent No. 2 is well advised to consider the Patna High Court CWJC No.1664 of 2022(6) dt.16-01-2025 2/2 case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not gone to the merit of the case. anand/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U