Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46557 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 937 of 2025 Applicant :- Jitendra Trivedi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Rai,Devesh Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manisha Kumari,Vishnu Pandey Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.98/2025, under Sections 80(2), 85, 125, 324 (4), 391(2) BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Sareni, District Raebareli. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant as well as perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks parity with co- accused Sheela Trivedi, who has been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.07.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6400 of 2025. It is submitted that the applicant, who is the father-in-law of the deceased, stands on the same footing. 4. This Court notes that while granting regular bail to the co- accused Sheela Trivedi, the benefit of Section 480 BNSS has been granted to her that too in a regular bail application. 5. From perusal of the record, it is evident that deceased died within seven years of marriage. The allegation is that she was administered poison in her matrimonial home. The applicant is named in the F.I.R. Further, when the family members of the deceased went to she her body, it is alleged that co-accused Manish Trivedi along with 10-12 persons threw bricks at them, resulting in damage to a four-wheeler and injuries to two female relatives of the complainant. 6. The nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the surrounding circumstances do not suggest false implication or that the applicant has been named merely with a view to humiliate him. The offence, prima facie, cannot be said to be of trivial nature. The viscera has been preserved, and the investigation is still ongoing. 7. Considering the gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, no case for anticipatory bail is made out at this stage. 8. The application is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 Shubhankar Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench